The biggest issue with lower than 4K is a "softness" but that can work to its advantage at times, particularly if you are going for a toonier look. Īs a very general rule you would want at least 2K for your photos for really good quality heads, but I have done famous folks at lower res (1K) and gotten decent results (it helps that we recognize the famous). The resolution of these images is 1024 x 1024 pixels, though I'm not sure whether they'll upload to the forum here at that resolution without degradation. I thought that they might be ideal for quick creation of 'extras' in film making ventures, suited to the 'auto mode'. I'll post a few here (or will post as many as anyone would like - I've got just over 300 of them). This criteria meant that, on average roughly 1 in 70 photos were suitable. Had minimal (if any) *artifacts* resulting from the 'AI construction'.The 'choices' made were based on images that were: ![]() ![]() Has anyone tried the automated AI face creation site called "thispersondoesnotexist"? I've been culling through what I think might be the most usuable images, though I have yet to test any of them by way of 'conversion' to 3D.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |